• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

That's a trillion instances heavier than all of humanity. You may repeat this hundreds of instances over the course of thousands and thousands of years. It all relies upon how fussy you are about how the Earth looks afterwards, of course. Suppose that there have been ten billion people (one other overestimate - there are about 6.4 billion on the time of writing). The most obvious major drawback with this technique is that proper now there aren't even theories as to how you might probably construct rocket engines of the kind proposed right here. The major problem right here is determining how to pick up big pieces of continental plate without breaking them. The principle right here is much the same, with the railguns behaving somewhat like discretized versions of thrusters, offering instantaneous modifications in velocity versus sustained regular change. Atmospheric concerns are ignored right here since it's much more energy-environment friendly to manually take away the Earth's atmosphere, transfer the planet, and reinstall it. Wait lengthy enough, and the photo voltaic wind blowing the sail outwards will take the Earth outward too, what is billiards since the two are gravitationally sure together!

And lastly, suppose that all of them jumped at exactly the identical prompt, which after all they won't, seeing as the time difference between the fastest watch and the slowest will seemingly be over 5 minutes. Note that the Earth doesn't and won't behave like a stable, inflexible billiard ball below such huge impacts as these. Suppose all people on the planet weighed 100kg (which is an overestimate, 70kg is extra prefer it, probably less). Ceres, the photo voltaic system's largest asteroid, has less than 1/40,000th the mass of Earth; the Moon, a mere 1/80th. These objects are the heaviest you're probably to find - there are heavier moons and complete planets you could think about using, however to be trustworthy from this point of view it seems to be more like using a succession of lots of, 1000's or tens of hundreds of smaller asteroid impacts can be a greater bet. If there was some way to electrically cost the Earth, by dumping plenty of identically charged particles onto the Earth or simply ionizing particles already on Earth - a big amber rod would possibly perhaps be so as - then we could use magnetic fields to drive the planet in the direction we wanted it to go.

Better, you can use many, many asteroids one after the opposite in a gentle stream, and reduce down the full time significantly. It is feasible to make use of a solar sail to steer the Earth into the Sun. Construct an enormous solar sail with a big mass. Direct matter propulsion. Same method as above, simply utilizing gigantic mass drivers/railguns to fireplace big portions of matter away from Earth, as an alternative of a rocket exhaust. Billiards method. Clonk the Earth with one thing massive and heavy, causing it to alter course. Let me emphasize the words "large", "heavy" and "clonk". Maybe Earth is about to hit an asteroid. You could possibly reuse the identical asteroid time and again, looping it round a few fuel giants and again to realize lots more kinetic power from those gas giants in the same method that Earth just gained velocity from the rock. It will get higher. Even assuming the Earth did transfer by some significant distance when everybody jumped, just think about it: it'd transfer right again once more! Maybe you need to destroy it: a big number of strategies for destroying the Earth contain transferring it by some substantial amount. Alternatively, as the Earth's angular kinetic energy is negligible in comparison with its orbital kinetic power, you might consider diverting a relatively small quantity of assets to easily stopping the Earth from spinning at all, earlier than starting the principle undertaking.

Moving the Sun is about 6 orders of magnitude harder than moving the Earth but the Sun is repeatedly emitting power which may be productively harnessed for this purpose. This structure would not be in orbit across the Sun, but static, remaining aloft using the radiation strain of catching and reflecting solar power. With half of the Sun's radiation blocked/reflected in the other path, the Sun now has a internet thrust upwards (i.e. within the course of the "hat"). Rather than merely bouncing off, the item destroyed a lot of each itself and Earth, causing a vast spray of matter to be hurled off from the influence level; this matter coagulated into what is now the Moon. Suppose that all of them jumped ten metres within the air (an enormous overestimate, fifty centimetres is more probably and probably much less). This can be employed to maneuver the Sun and Earth in tandem to a place the place the Earth can extra simply be destroyed. Direct rocket propulsion. Build gigantic, presumably nuclear upward-pointing rocket furnaces, perhaps one, maybe 4, perhaps a million, whatever you'll be able to finances for. Build an unlimited lightweight "hat" for the Sun, which catches the Sun's rays.